Progressive rear shocks best price

This is for general posts and questions concerning only the Voyager XII (1200cc, Four-cylinder) Years 1986 thru 2003.

Moderators: the2knights, Highway Rider

Post Reply
lockwoodjohn
Traveler
Traveler
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:34 am
11
Current bike(s): 1995 Kawasaki 1200 Voyager VII
Location: Lockwood,New York
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by lockwoodjohn »

Hi everyone,
Want to upgrade my stock rear shocks with Progressive shocks. where is the best place to purchase them. The cheapest price. I know I can get them right from progressive.

Thank You Lockwoodjohn
voyager55
Elite Tourer
Elite Tourer
Posts: 820
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:08 am
11
Current bike(s): 2003 1200
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by voyager55 »

User avatar
ghostler
Grand Tourer
Grand Tourer
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:44 pm
11
Current bike(s): 2001 Voyager XII, 1971 Honda CB100
Asphalt, the final frontier; these are the treks of the Kawasaki Voyager; its continuing mission to explore strange new roads, to seek out new sites, new bed & breakfasts, to boldly ride where no one has ridden before.
Location: Clovis, NM
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 10 times
Contact:

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by ghostler »

Previous owner replaced the rear shocks with a custom air shock ($$$), so I haven't messed with the rears, this is academic.

Amazon has a pair of rear Progressives for $67.68 with free shipping. Says they are compatible with my 2001 XII. I think I bought my front ones from the same seller, they worked out well. However, I'd verify just to be sure they are the right ones.

https://smile.amazon.com/Progressive-Su ... 000UKCQ2A/
2017-08-01 XII Progressive Rear Springs Amazon.jpg
George Hostler
Clovis, NM, US

Christian Motorcycle Association
Salvation Army Motorcycle Ministry, Western Territory
http://tsammcentral.org/
2001 Kawasaki ZG1200 Voyager XII
1971 Honda CB100
lockwoodjohn
Traveler
Traveler
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:34 am
11
Current bike(s): 1995 Kawasaki 1200 Voyager VII
Location: Lockwood,New York
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by lockwoodjohn »

thank you for all the information!
Lockwoodjohn
voyager55
Elite Tourer
Elite Tourer
Posts: 820
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:08 am
11
Current bike(s): 2003 1200
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by voyager55 »

Buy the entire shock assembled. 2 bolts and they are on.
User avatar
Barry
Grand Tourer
Grand Tourer
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:00 pm
16
Current bike(s): 87 Voyager 12
Has liked: 100 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by Barry »

Both ebay and amazon are currently at $269 with shippping. I couldn't find them anywhere cheaper. I did call a few places, but gave up and just ordered them. Progressive 412-4221C
Barry
87 Voyager XII
User avatar
cranky
King of the Road
King of the Road
Posts: 1037
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 12:36 am
8
Current bike(s): 2003 Voyager
Location: San Jose, KalEfornYa
Has liked: 303 times
Been liked: 80 times

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by cranky »

.... just curious, do you know the inch length rear shocks to get with front
progressive springs, as they DO raise the front end up!!! Might hafta do
that also... The Progressive front springs really lifted it up!!! I think
one of the previous owners also took some front spacers out for an
inseam problem.... cause I had to re-cut my windshield again after
the change!!! 2 1/2'+!!!!!
'03 Voyager - http://tinyurl.com/mqtgpwp VROC pics of Gina
Cranky - Bill Snodgrass AVA # 6544. VROC # 16804
Cranked >128K miles, Mtn bike-no motor!!!
San Jose, KalEfornYa
User avatar
ghostler
Grand Tourer
Grand Tourer
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:44 pm
11
Current bike(s): 2001 Voyager XII, 1971 Honda CB100
Asphalt, the final frontier; these are the treks of the Kawasaki Voyager; its continuing mission to explore strange new roads, to seek out new sites, new bed & breakfasts, to boldly ride where no one has ridden before.
Location: Clovis, NM
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 10 times
Contact:

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by ghostler »

With my bike, the Progressives up front restored normal height. The original springs had the spacer there, but they behaved as though they were worn out. I'd think that is what happened to your bike. The backs use higher air pressure and as a result, I'd think that if it were aired up to max would give an idea whether rear springs are shot or not.
(But that is just a conjecture.) :corn:
George Hostler
Clovis, NM, US

Christian Motorcycle Association
Salvation Army Motorcycle Ministry, Western Territory
http://tsammcentral.org/
2001 Kawasaki ZG1200 Voyager XII
1971 Honda CB100
User avatar
Barry
Grand Tourer
Grand Tourer
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:00 pm
16
Current bike(s): 87 Voyager 12
Has liked: 100 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by Barry »

I'm pretty sure the rear shocks should be 13 inches.
Regarding suspension sag: In a perfect world, with no one sitting on the bike, the front and rear suspension should be at the top of their travel. Hypothetically, say you had 5 inches of suspension travel. ( I think we have less travel) When you sit on the bike the suspension front and rear should drop at least an inch or more, so when you're riding there is suspension travel both upwards and downwards, always keeping the tires in contact with the road surface. The only reason that progressive front springs would raise the front of the bike would be if the original springs were shot.
Barry
87 Voyager XII
User avatar
Nails
King of the Road
King of the Road
Posts: 1771
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:37 pm
7
Current bike(s): '97 XII
'00 XT350
'85 KLR 250
'82 Silverwing Sushiguzzi
Location: New Mexico Rockies
Has liked: 228 times
Been liked: 602 times

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by Nails »

Regarding suspension sag: In a perfect world, with no one sitting on the bike, the front and rear suspension should be at the top of their travel. ... When you sit on the bike the suspension front and rear should drop at least an inch or more, so when you're riding there is suspension travel both upwards and downwards, always keeping the tires in contact with the road surface.
With respect, the springs would be fully extended only with the wheels in the air. When you put the wheels on the ground, the suspension compresses some. It compresses some more when you sit on it. And a little more if you bounce on it and let it settle.

This is preload. With dirt bikes, I shoot for about 28% of the suspension travel. (AFAIK, this is true for all bikes.) You might be able to get that with a preload adjuster, if available.

Otherwise, you might just need stiffer springs. Or springs that haven't become noodles.
When you sit on the bike the suspension front and rear should drop at least an inch or more, so when you're riding there is suspension travel both upwards and downwards, always keeping the tires in contact with the road surface. The only reason that progressive front springs would raise the front of the bike would be if the original springs were shot.
Just as you say. (I'm making a distinction without a difference.)

For dirt bikes again (where this actually matters a lot), I measure the height of the suspension as fully compressed (such as when you have the springs out/off). When it's back together, measure the length with the tires off the ground. (Use whatever reference points you like best, with some allowance for geometry that isn't normal to the ground.) This is the total suspension travel (or just look it up).

If you like, measure the lengths after you put it on the ground (static load), but honestly I don't know what to do with that, other than as a proxy for how fat I'm getting. Then measure the length when sitting on it (yeah, need someone else to measure it). This is preload. Some folks make a fuss about stiction: how much shorter it gets after you bounce a bit and let it settle, versus just sit in it and call it good. But I don't have much use for this, either (the seals &etc certainly are sticky, though). I just have a friend measure after I bounce some.

Now do some advanced arithmetic and calculate the percent of the total suspension travel taken up by the non-stiction preload. If it's, say, 20%, then I want springs that are about 8% softer. If my springs are 100 lb/inch, then I want to replace them with springs that are about 92 lb/inch.

And then you can get silly-complicated with damping rates &etc. Cartridge forks, or add-on emulators (like Race Tech), allow getting silly like that.

No, I haven't measured this stuff on my XII, either. I'm just spurting what I think I know. (An "expert" is a spurt under pressure.)
--
Nails
User avatar
Barry
Grand Tourer
Grand Tourer
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:00 pm
16
Current bike(s): 87 Voyager 12
Has liked: 100 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by Barry »

Nails,
I agree with all you said. I've only met one vxii rider that installed Race Tech Emulators on his vxii. He says it was one of the best modifications to his vxii. I can also say that he was hard to keep up with in the twisties. :bowdn: But now he rides a 1700 and is on the board of directors. :hmm:
Barry
87 Voyager XII
cushman eagle
King of the Road
King of the Road
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 10:08 pm
13
Current bike(s): '99 Kawasaki Voyager 1200
1958 Cushman Eagle restoration has been finished,and have put 3030 miles on her!
Location: Orrville,Ohio
Has liked: 855 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by cushman eagle »

When my left OEM shock started leaking oil,I researched progressive 412 shocks,and saw they were charged with nitrogen.With the high failure rate of the nitrogen charge in the struts for doors and hoods in our farm equipment,I decided to buy progressive 416s so I could recharge them at home in a couple minutes.I find no advantage of the 416s over the OEMs after I changed the OEM oil to lo-vis ATF accept the 416s do not leak.
'99 Voyager VXII,'58 Cushman Eagle
User avatar
Nails
King of the Road
King of the Road
Posts: 1771
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:37 pm
7
Current bike(s): '97 XII
'00 XT350
'85 KLR 250
'82 Silverwing Sushiguzzi
Location: New Mexico Rockies
Has liked: 228 times
Been liked: 602 times

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by Nails »

and is on the board of directors
They only accept Emulators on this BoD?
--
Nails
User avatar
Neal
Tourer
Tourer
Posts: 233
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:03 pm
16
Current bike(s): 2001 Voyager, 2002 Voyager
Location: Evart, Michigan
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Progressive rear shocks best price

Post by Neal »

Barry wrote:Nails,
I agree with all you said. I've only met one vxii rider that installed Race Tech Emulators on his vxii. He says it was one of the best modifications to his vxii. I can also say that he was hard to keep up with in the twisties. :bowdn: But now he rides a 1700 and is on the board of directors. :hmm:
But in his 'previous life' his hobby was road racing. :wnk2:
Dealer for all Air Rider products, and Nolan helmets and headsets.
Post Reply

Return to “General - Voyager XII (1200 Four)”